SUBJECTS: The NY Times’ story about former Nat’l Security Adv John Bolton claiming Trump wanted a quid-pro-quo with the Ukraine government (defined as aid-for-investigating-the-Bidens) proves to be at odds with the actions and statements by Bolton and the witnesses they used – ooopsies! //Isn’t a ‘head-fake quid-pro-quo’ even more unworthy as grounds for impeachment than an actual one? //Why does the media continue dismissing the non-dismissible reporting of Ukrainian meddling in our 2016 Election just because it bolsters Trump’s defense in conversing about election corruption with President Zelensky on July 25th 2019? Listen Live: